Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1095345

ABSTRACT

As the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is transmitted mainly through droplets, sneezes and aerosols, there is a high risk of transmission during dental procedures. This report describes measures that can be adopted by oral healthcare personnel to minimize the risk of cross-contamination in clinical practice during the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. (AU)


Dado que el SARS-CoV-2, causante de síndrome respiratorio agudo severo, se transmite principalmente por medio de gotitas, estornudos y aerosoles, existe un alto riesgo de transmisión durante los procedimientos dentales. En este informe se describen las medidas que puede adoptar el personal de salud bucodental para reducir al mínimo el riesgo de contaminación cruzada en la práctica clínica durante la actual pandemia por SARS-CoV-2.(AU)


Como o SARS-CoV-2, que causa síndrome respiratória aguda grave, é transmitido principalmente por gotícu-las, espirros e aerossóis, há um alto risco de transmissão durante os procedimentos odontológicos. Este relatório descreve os passos que podem ser tomados pelo pessoal de saúde oral para minimizar o risco de contaminação cruzada na prática clínica durante a actual pandemia do SARS-CoV-2.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Dental Care/standards , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Practice Patterns, Dentists'/standards , Pandemics
2.
J Appl Oral Sci ; 27: e20180195, 2019 01 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30673030

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Pain due to administration of local anesthetics is the primary reason for patients' fear and anxiety, and various methods are used to minimize it. This study aimed to measure the degree of pain during administration of anesthesia and determine the latency time and duration of pulpal anesthesia using two anesthetic methods in the maxilla. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, single-blind, split-mouth clinical trial was conducted with 41 volunteers who required class I restorations in the maxillary first molars. Local anesthesia was administered with a needleless jet injection system (experimental group) or with a carpule syringe (control) using a 30-gauge short needle. The method of anesthesia and laterality of the maxilla were randomized. A pulp electric tester measured the latency time and duration of anesthesia in the second molar. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to measure the degree of pain during the anesthetic method. Data were tabulated and then analyzed by a statistician. The t-test was used to analyze the differences between the groups for basal electrical stimulation. Duration of anesthesia and degree of pain were compared using the Mann-Whitney test. A 5% significance level was considered. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in the basal electrical stimulation threshold (mA) and degree of pain between the two methods of anesthesia (p>0.05). Latency time was 2 minutes for all subjects. The duration of pulpal anesthesia showed no statistical difference (minutes) between the two methods (p<0.001), with a longer duration for the traditional method of anesthesia (median of 40 minutes). CONCLUSIONS: The two anesthetics methods did not differ concerning the pain experienced during anesthesia. Latency lasted 2 minutes for all subjects; the traditional infiltration anesthesia resulted in a longer anesthetic duration compared with the needleless jet injection.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Dental/methods , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Injections, Jet/methods , Pain Measurement/methods , Pain, Procedural/diagnosis , Adult , Anesthesia, Dental/adverse effects , Dental Pulp/drug effects , Dental Restoration, Permanent/methods , Electric Stimulation , Female , Humans , Male , Needles , Pain Threshold , Reproducibility of Results , Single-Blind Method , Statistics, Nonparametric , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
3.
J. appl. oral sci ; 27: e20180195, 2019. graf
Article in English | LILACS, BBO - Dentistry | ID: biblio-975891

ABSTRACT

Abstract Pain due to administration of local anesthetics is the primary reason for patients' fear and anxiety, and various methods are used to minimize it. This study aimed to measure the degree of pain during administration of anesthesia and determine the latency time and duration of pulpal anesthesia using two anesthetic methods in the maxilla. Materials and Methods: A randomized, single-blind, split-mouth clinical trial was conducted with 41 volunteers who required class I restorations in the maxillary first molars. Local anesthesia was administered with a needleless jet injection system (experimental group) or with a carpule syringe (control) using a 30-gauge short needle. The method of anesthesia and laterality of the maxilla were randomized. A pulp electric tester measured the latency time and duration of anesthesia in the second molar. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to measure the degree of pain during the anesthetic method. Data were tabulated and then analyzed by a statistician. The t-test was used to analyze the differences between the groups for basal electrical stimulation. Duration of anesthesia and degree of pain were compared using the Mann-Whitney test. A 5% significance level was considered. Results: There was no statistical difference in the basal electrical stimulation threshold (mA) and degree of pain between the two methods of anesthesia (p>0.05). Latency time was 2 minutes for all subjects. The duration of pulpal anesthesia showed no statistical difference (minutes) between the two methods (p<0.001), with a longer duration for the traditional method of anesthesia (median of 40 minutes). Conclusions: The two anesthetics methods did not differ concerning the pain experienced during anesthesia. Latency lasted 2 minutes for all subjects; the traditional infiltration anesthesia resulted in a longer anesthetic duration compared with the needleless jet injection.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Young Adult , Pain Measurement/methods , Injections, Jet/methods , Pain, Procedural/diagnosis , Anesthesia, Dental/methods , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Time Factors , Single-Blind Method , Reproducibility of Results , Treatment Outcome , Pain Threshold , Statistics, Nonparametric , Dental Pulp/drug effects , Dental Restoration, Permanent/methods , Electric Stimulation , Anesthesia, Dental/adverse effects , Needles
4.
Braz. dent. sci ; 21(2): 230-236, 2018. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS, BBO - Dentistry | ID: biblio-906224

ABSTRACT

Objective: This study evaluated changes in the esthetic perceptions of patients subjected to inoffice tooth bleaching. Material and Methods: Fifty participants included in a clinical trial evaluating the in-office tooth bleaching answered two questionnaires about their dental esthetic perceptions. The participants answered the Orofacial Esthetic Scale (OES) questionnaire and the Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire (PIDAQ) before and after treatment. The average scores observed at baseline were compared with those recorded after tooth bleaching using the paired t-test or the Wilcoxon signed rank test (α = 0.05). Results: Improvement in tooth color (reduction of 5.1 shade guide units) had a positive impact on patients' perceptions. According to PIDAQ, tooth bleaching significantly increased the psychological impact and dental selfconfidence; and reduced esthetic concerns. The OES demonstrated improvements in participants' satisfaction for all questions, except for the one on "facial appearance". However, higher effect size was observed for the question related to tooth color, as expected. Conclusion: Tooth bleaching was associated with an overall improvement in dental esthetic perception, even when only tooth color was affected. (AU)


Objetivo: Este estudo avaliou mudanças nas percepções estéticas de pacientes submetidos a clareamento dental de consultório. Material e Métodos: Cinquenta pacientes incluídos em um ensaio clínico avaliando clareamento dental de consultório responderam a dois questionários sobre suas percepções estética odontológicas. Os participantes responderam ao questionário de escala estética orofacial (EEO) e o questionário de impacto psicossocial da estética orofacial (PIDAQ) antes e após o tratamento. As médias dos escores no início do tratamento foram comparados com aqueles mensurados após o clareamento usando o teste-T pareado ou de Wilcoxon (α = 0,05). Resultados: Melhora na cor dental (redução de 5,1 unidades da escala de cor) teve um impacto positivo nas percepções dos pacientes. De acordo com PIDAQ, o clareamento dental significativamente aumentou o impacto psicossocial e autoconfiança dental, e reduziu as preocupações estéticas. O EEO demonstrou melhora na satisfação dos participantes para todas as questões, exceto para a de "aparência facial". Entretanto, maior efeito foi observado para a questão relacionada à cor dos dentes, como esperado. Conclusão: O clareamento dental foi associado com um aumento geral na percepção estética odontológica, mesmo que apenas a cor dos dentes foi afetada. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Enamel Microabrasion , Esthetics, Dental , Randomized Controlled Trial , Tooth Bleaching
5.
Rev. bras. odontol ; 64(3/4): 200-204, 2007. ilus
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, BBO - Dentistry | ID: lil-541880

ABSTRACT

O objetivo deste trabalho é relatar um caso de cisto nasolabial discutindo a importância de seu diagnóstico diferencial. Mulher de 44 anos apresentou aumento de volume assintomático no lábio superior do lado direito com duração de três meses. O exame radiográfico mostrou a presença de uma área radiolúcida próxima aos ápices dos dentes 12 e 13 e todos os dentes da região mostravam vitalidade pulpar. Biópsia incisional da lesão mostrou diagnóstico de cisto nasolabial, confirmado após sua remoção completa sob anestesia geral. A paciente permanece em acompanhamento há 24 meses sem sinais de recidiva local.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adult , Cysts/surgery , Diagnosis, Differential , Lip , Maxilla , Nose
6.
Rev. Clín. Ortod. Dent. Press ; 4(2): 53-59, abr.-maio 2005. ilus
Article in Portuguese | BBO - Dentistry | ID: biblio-856170

ABSTRACT

A correção das discrepâncias maxilomandibulares transversais, em pacientes adultos, é comumente realizada através de cirurgia maxilar, seja através de expansão rápida cirurgicamente assistida da maxila, ou através da osteotomia do tipo Le Fort I segmentar. Entretanto, em algumas situações em que cirurgia mandibular isolada é necessária para a correção de algumas deformidades dentofaciais, é possível a correção de problemas transversos associados através de osteotomia da linha média mandibular para contração. Esta tem se mostrado uma técnica simples, com baixo índice de complicações e pequena morbidade pós-operatória, capaz de oferecer inúmeras vantagens, tornando-se uma opção atraente nos dias de hoje


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adult , Models, Dental , Mandible/surgery , Osteotomy/methods , Osteotomy, Le Fort , Tooth Extraction
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...